Punishment and Rehabilitation
Last week, team production and gift exchange
were discussed. In the team production, we talked about the past performance
and how the current reward should be divided. This week, we are looking at the
team production in the other way; How can we improve the performances of each
worker to have the better team production?
There are various ways to improve the performance of the worker. The boss can encourage under-performed employees to make them be productive again, or the boss can discipline under-performed employee. How hard does the boss or manager should discipline their workers to rehabilitate the relationship? I believe that moderate discipline and the following encouragement like compliments can rehabilitate the relationship and increase their productivity.
I have worked as an assistant teacher during
summer for three years. When I worked as assistant teacher at summer camp in
China in 2018, I was able to see several disciplinary moments. The summer camp
was held for four weeks, and it was for Korean students who want to learn Chinese.
The camp was hosted by Korean department of international school in Shanghai, China.
The teachers in summer camp were all from that school so that students who are
interested in entering the school can experience learning from the same teachers.
There were not only learning part in the camp, but also experiencing Chinese
culture. So, teachers had to bring students to some places in Shanghai. One day,
the teacher and one assistant teacher brought some students to huge market
letting them have some shopping time. But, one student was missing for an hour.
The student went to the other market nearby and couldn’t find the way back. Later,
the director heard about this incident. The director was extremely upset about
it and yelled at the assistant teacher, not the main teacher. Instead, the director
politely told the teacher to be more be careful since you are the one with responsibility
of students. The assistant teacher was frustrated after the discipline and
wanted to quit due to the stress on her responsibility over students. As
expected, I couldn’t see that that assistant teacher in 2019 summer camp, even
though college students who worked as an assistant teacher in the former year usually
re-work in the following years as me.
After this incident, losing students had
never happened again. In this case, I think the director’s discipline to
assistant teacher was appropriate since it is a crucial mistake to losing
students during camp in some foreign country. I think the reason why the director
not yelling at the teacher was wise. It can be unfair and not understandable at
the first time, but it is important for director not to ruin positive relationship
with teachers and make them under-performed in teaching students at school in
the future. And, it is not main responsibility for teacher to look after
students in safe-wise. Teachers’ main responsibility is to teach Chinese well
in the camp at that time. For assistant teachers, the director can always hire
new better-performing employees in the future, not quite for the teachers.
On the other day, I was in administrative
office and could hear disciplines by boss to administrative teachers. The
administrative teachers were in charge of making photo albums to be distributed
to students after the camp, and they didn’t include important information in
the album. It was a mistake and they had to print all albums for students again
which costed quite a lot of money. The boss was unhappy about it and talked how
their performances are not satisfying to the boss for long time. The boss
brought up some past mistakes and disciplines as well and pushed administrative
teachers harder. The administrative teachers who were disciplined seemed
exhausted and less passionate about the responsibilities that they currently
have. It seemed like they were usually disciplined by their boss and used to it,
yet their performances are not getting better and still making mistakes.
Pushing harder on employees can be
effective for short time. However, in the long run, it can be less efficient. If
I were the boss in the administrative office, I would tell them remake the album as
soon as possible and not make the mistake again in the future, not like 20
minutes disciplines or talking about the past mistakes to discourage workers. Listening
to the discipline for such long time is stressful for workers and embarrassing,
making them less passionate for their work. After disciplines, I think that
compliments on their recent/future work can balance their stress and rehabilitate
the relationship. In addition, giving incentives or bonus to workers if they
performed well is helpful to make workers productive. If workers get disciplines
a lot, they won’t be confident about their performance, possibly decreasing
work efficiency. And, I believe disciplining should be happened privately, not
making the person receiving discipline embarrassed. Disciplining in the public
can warn gently other workers but for the rehabilitating relationship, it should
be done in privately. It can make the overall work atmosphere down, when done in public. Overall, I think that balancing moderate punishment and
encouragement to workers is important to make the productive team and better
performance of individual workers.
In the story about the market, it would have helped me to understand things if the same visit to the market happened the year before without incident or if this was the first time it happened. In other words, was there a basis to assume this was do-able ahead of time? You reported that nobody got lost after that, but I didn't understand if the circumstances were otherwise the same or not.
ReplyDeleteI do think culture matters for this prompt and how this would be handled in the U.S. might be different than how it was handled in your case. That said, I wonder if the assistant teacher had made previous mistakes or if this was the first one. While it is true that the mistake was of a good deal of consequence, if it is the first one then the assistant teacher might have made the mistake without realizing it. In other words, the assistant teacher wasn't prepped properly for this task. Whose responsibility would that have been?
This is a quite tricky thing in general in organizations. Most of the time, subordinates want more autonomy, so they can exercise their own discretion. Providing such autonomy is a good form of motivation. But the subordinate might not really be ready to recognize the responsibility entailed with the autonomy and then take risks that shouldn't be taken. Punishing after the fact is one way to address the issue. Having the subordinate on a tighter leash before the fact is a different way to address the issue. There isn't one right answer to how to do this.
Yes. It was the same market visiting with students for several years in the past. As far as I know, that was the first and the last incident happened. The circumstances are the same; assistant teacher, teacher and students take the bus in front of the school to go to the nearby market and experience daily-life as buying and taking public transportation. And, assistant teachers get trained regarding leading students outside the school before the camp. We were trained to stay all together, and each teacher to be positioned in front and the back. I also think that it is manageable to lead 5-7 students at a time with two responsible teachers.
DeleteI think I didn't explain how the incident happened in detail on the blog post. I believe that the assistant teacher hadn't made previous mistakes. But when the situation was explained by the assistant teacher, the assistant teacher and teacher agreed to split in two groups and she let her group of students to have free time for few minutes and then one student had been missing, which I think it is not appropriate decision with possible good deal of consequence. If there were any training or rules to follow regarding leading the students, it would have been the manager/director's responsibility. And, even if it was the assistant teacher's mistake, school and director will be mainly responsible for the consequence of incident anyways.
I agree with you that subordinates want more autonomy, exercising their own discretion which is productive/positive motion under proper boundary. So, I think that training subordinates to let them understand deeply on their own responsibility is important. In this case for assistant teacher, I think her action was out of the boundary.